Schema coverage
See whether the page has structured data at all and whether it matches the kind of page being audited.
Open another workflow if the page needs speed, indexing, internal links, or content planning.
This tool is designed to review whether a page carries useful structured data, whether that markup matches the page type, and whether the page looks eligible for the kinds of rich results that matter to the content. The goal is not to add schema everywhere. The goal is to add the right markup to the right pages and avoid weak, noisy, or misleading implementations.
What It Will Help With
See whether the page has structured data at all and whether it matches the kind of page being audited.
Prioritise schema types that may support clearer appearance in search rather than generic markup for its own sake.
Turn a vague schema warning into a specific next step such as FAQ cleanup, article markup review, or product/service clarification.
First Version
Use this after the SEO audit when a page needs stronger SERP presentation or better structured interpretation, not as a vanity checklist item.
Article and BreadcrumbList markup detected, with no critical JSON-LD syntax errors.
FAQ content exists on the page, but no FAQPage markup is present or the questions are not visible enough.
Add page-type-specific markup only where it matches visible page content and avoids overclaiming.
It can detect schema types, syntax patterns, and whether markup broadly matches the page type.
Google decides eligibility, display, and timing. Valid schema does not guarantee enhanced search appearance.
Check that every marked-up claim is visible, accurate, and useful on the actual page.
No. Valid markup can improve clarity and eligibility, but Google decides whether rich results appear.
No. Add structured data where it matches visible page content and supports the page type.